LakeMaster vs AutoChart mapping images

Post new topic   Reply to topic

View previous topic View next topic Go down

LakeMaster vs AutoChart mapping images

Post by EricM on Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:03 pm

I found an interesting area in the deep water of Chickamauga Lake in Tennessee, and carefully mapped it with AutoChart. The detail difference is amazing. The upper left blue dot is the head of a ravine between two steep ridges, funneling the deep catfish (in this case) and making it a fishing hot spot. The other two blue dots are set on the long ridge with deeper water to the right.
The area was mapped by using an east-west pattern of passes approx. 20 feet apart. The top map is the original LakeMaster, with the AutoChart overlay following.
This just illustrates how careful mapping of your favorite spots can improve even existing detailed LakeMaster maps.



avatar
EricM

Posts : 7
Join date : 2014-08-18
Location : Cleveland, TN

Back to top Go down

Re: LakeMaster vs AutoChart mapping images

Post by DougV on Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:03 pm

Great Example the Benefits of Auto Charts. LakeMaster does an amazing job but they are limited by time to scan every detail. That is why AutoCharts is so valuable. Especially in your example where the contours change to 3' in very deep waters. Good Reason to show the benefits of Auto Charts for your favorite areas. A little investment of time recording sonar can provide huge Benefits!
avatar
DougV
Admin

Posts : 26
Join date : 2014-07-23
Age : 48
Location : Higginsville, Missouri

http://www.dougvahrenberg.com

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum